No she didn't...

Gwyneth Paltrow gave birth to a baby girl she named Apple.

Apple? Apple Martin? Add and "i" on the end and I'll want to drink her.

---

Posted by Lawren at May 15, 2004 08:49 AM

You Said

That last sentence about killed me. I need to stop eating breakfast in front of the computer.

I hope she doesn't turn into a freak with names like Michael Jackson.

Says: chuck at May 15, 2004 11:38 AM

---

That last sentence is so wrong on so many levels! ;-)

Says: Daisyhead at May 15, 2004 07:56 PM

---

OMG!! That's JUST what I said when my friend informed me of this terrible tragedy! WHAT is that woman doing to her poor child? It's a life sentence of taunting and teasing, all so she can name her first born after her favorite drink... Celebrities are such a@@holes }:(

Says: Le Serial Cynica at May 15, 2004 09:30 PM

---

Just talking with a friend about this and the comments get worse.
Friend: Apple? At least with a name like River it would do something, but Apple??? You eat an apple!
Me: when she hits puberty I'm sure a lot of teen-age boys will want to eat her as well!

Celebreties shoud NOT be allowed to name children. Perhaps the service and be hired out for them?

Says: Brian D. at May 15, 2004 11:57 PM

---

George Costanza was a trail blazer. In an episode of Seinfeld, George suggested the name Seven for a baby. He later followed with "Soda."

Apple?

Christ.

Why not Outlet? Or Dish? Or Fireplace? How about Pencil?

Apple. Ummm....kay.

People are stupid.

Period.

Says: Kevin the Interloper at May 16, 2004 01:32 AM

---

Personally, I'm okay with it. There certainly are dumber names out there, and hey, is it any more meaningless than naming girls after the seasons or months of the years?

Additionally, if she ends up looking anything like her Mom, I doubt anyone will care.

Says: Kevin at May 16, 2004 09:00 AM

---

>Spyware Removal - Net Cop - Spyware Removal

Says: Net-Cop at February 15, 2005 04:44 AM

---