Martinis, Persistence, and a Smile



June 2006

S M T W T F S

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

 

All Archives by Title


Recent Entries

Shiloh
Rude
Genius
Fugly
Things That Make You Go Hmm
Marc Loves Lola
D-Day
This Is What Happens When You Don't Eat
Margene Cheats On Bill
Coors' New Marketing Initiative
Alba Gets Sloppy Seconds
Duets
Life Imitating Art?
What Would Danny Think?
Clooney and Pitt's Project Is a Bust
Janice Tells All
Brit To Design Baby Clothes
Calvin Is Technosexual
Pee Wee's Back!
Jen Weeps


Monthly Archives

June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003


Search




My Blogroll



The WeatherPixie

Giving Credit

Powered by:
Moveable Type 2.63
Template by:
Elegant Webscapes


Other


Wedding Trend | Main | Nip No More


September 06, 2004

Cojo Says...

Stephen Cojocaru's take on Teresa Heinz Kerry's look:

"I must bring up the topic ... Teresa and the hair. The hair is a little too wild and savage. If you're one of the members of Destiny's Child, that's good hair! But maybe for the future first lady, I think she needs more tapered."

--Agreed, Cojo.


Posted by Lawren at September 6, 2004 09:04 AM

You Said

Compared to... Laura? I get the school-marm thing, but school-marms from thirty years ago?

Says: Kevin at September 6, 2004 09:06 AM

I agree that Laura could be a bit more cutting edge, but I always thinks she looks well put together. And, I think she dresses in clothing that flatters her body -- which Hillary needed to learn how to do.

Says: Lawren at September 6, 2004 09:37 AM

Was Hill in spandex or something? Pantsuits are pantsuits. =)

Says: Kevin at September 6, 2004 09:41 AM

She would wear skirts that were the WORST length and her kankles would always be showing. Agreed--pantsuits are pantsuits, and she should have stuck with those.

And she had a bad hat obsession too. :)

Says: Lawren at September 6, 2004 09:43 AM

Back off, Lawren! When you insult Hillary, it's personal!

Admittedly, Hillary did go through her, let's say adjustment, period from 1991-1997. However, she was First Lady of Arkansas, so we should be lucky she wasn't wearing coonskin and flannel. However, after 1997, she wisely engaged the right stylist for her clothes and hair, and looks great. On the other hand, Laura Bush seems to pick out her dresses from whatever fabric is on the couches in the clearence aisle at Big Lots. This is why being a Republican sucks- when you want to put gay people in prison, you're stuck with the heteros for fashion tips, and Lord knows they don't know shit!

Says: chuck at September 6, 2004 10:24 AM

Wait until I become President, Chuck. :)

Says: Lawren at September 6, 2004 10:25 AM

In 3 presidental cycles you'll be old enough for the office Lawren and I'll vote for ya!

Of course I'm running in the next one and a good suit makes even me look good. Since I'm single we'll never have a discussion on how my wife looks pantsuits or not! ;-)

Says: Brian D. at September 6, 2004 12:35 PM

Ohmigod, Lawren - KANKLES!!! I freaking love that word!!! And, I have to agree with you on this, L, as Hillary tended to look a bit of a mess, and Laura always looks well put together, a bit schoolmarmish, yes, but still a very classy lady...see, chuck, now you know why i get so mad when you call my black pantsuit, my Hillary Clinton...that is NOT a compliment...it means it looks like i have a big ol' ass, and KANKLES!

Says: at September 7, 2004 08:16 AM

Post a comment






Remember personal info?